You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Boundary curvature guided programmable shape-morphing kirigami sheets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-022-28187-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yaoye Hong, Yinding Chi, Shuang Wu, Yanbin Li, Yong Zhu, Jie Yin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
Singapore | 2 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 22 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 55% |
Scientists | 19 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 24 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#149,889
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,126
of 56,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,781
of 516,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#76
of 1,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.