You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High Costs of Female Choice in a Lekking Lizard
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000567 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maren N. Vitousek, Mark A. Mitchell, Anthony J. Woakes, Michael D. Niemack, Martin Wikelski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 65% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,685,644
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,734
of 199,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,448
of 69,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#58
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.