You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can pay for performance improve the quality of primary care?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.i4058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Roland, Frede Olesen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,468,512
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#14,437
of 64,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,661
of 381,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#181
of 846 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 846 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.