↓ Skip to main content

Can pay for performance improve the quality of primary care?:

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can pay for performance improve the quality of primary care?:
Published in
British Medical Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Roland, Frede Olesen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Unspecified 10 13%
Professor 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Unspecified 12 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 14%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Other 12 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#574,064
of 13,521,117 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#7,624
of 44,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,726
of 263,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#174
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,521,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.