You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant Classification from Bat-Like Echolocation Signals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yossi Yovel, Matthias Otto Franz, Peter Stilz, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 505 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 116 | 22% |
| Researcher | 85 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 14% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 113 | 21% |
| Unknown | 79 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 24% |
| Engineering | 54 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 28 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 170 | 32% |
| Unknown | 86 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,645,136
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,403
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,999
of 96,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.