You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Source of Sustained Voltage Difference between the Xylem of a Potted Ficus benjamina Tree and Its Soil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002963 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Love, Shuguang Zhang, Andreas Mershin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 26% |
| Engineering | 15 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,414,491
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,272
of 201,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,385
of 83,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.