You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Humans and Mice Express Similar Olfactory Preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathalie Mandairon, Johan Poncelet, Moustafa Bensafi, Anne Didier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#1,404,862
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,231
of 199,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,821
of 172,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#54
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.