You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Phylemon 2.0: a suite of web-tools for molecular evolution, phylogenetics, phylogenomics and hypotheses testing
Nucleic Acids Research, June 2011
R. Sanchez, F. Serra, J. Tarraga, I. Medina, J. Carbonell, L. Pulido, A. de Maria, S. Capella-Gutierrez, J. Huerta-Cepas, T. Gabaldon, J. Dopazo, H. Dopazo
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||38||18%|
|Student > Master||30||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||20||10%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||12||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||129||61%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||30||14%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||<1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2011.
All research outputs
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
of 26,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 111,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.