↓ Skip to main content

Knotted vs. Unknotted Proteins: Evidence of Knot-Promoting Loops

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knotted vs. Unknotted Proteins: Evidence of Knot-Promoting Loops
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000864
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raffaello Potestio, Cristian Micheletti, Henri Orland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Chemistry 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2011.
All research outputs
#5,264,683
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,008
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,531
of 103,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#18
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.