You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computer Simulation of Cellular Patterning Within the Drosophila Pupal Eye
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000841 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David E. Larson, Ruth I. Johnson, Maciej Swat, Julia B. Cordero, James A. Glazier, Ross L. Cagan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 30% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2010.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,517
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,506
of 104,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.