You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diffusion, Crowding & Protein Stability in a Dynamic Molecular Model of the Bacterial Cytoplasm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000694 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean R. McGuffee, Adrian H. Elcock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| Japan | 6 | 8% |
| Argentina | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Jordan | 3 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 73% |
| Scientists | 16 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 830 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| Germany | 11 | 1% |
| Japan | 6 | <1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 742 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 221 | 27% |
| Researcher | 201 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 9% |
| Professor | 59 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 6% |
| Other | 144 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 258 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 142 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 103 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 88 | 11% |
| Engineering | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 92 | 11% |
| Unknown | 101 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#562,586
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#409
of 9,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,524
of 103,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.