You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beyond Marine Reserves: Exploring the Approach of Selecting Areas where Fishing Is Permitted, Rather than Prohibited
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie C. Ban, Amanda C. J. Vincent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 12 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 161 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 68 | 37% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,601,859
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,838
of 220,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,897
of 122,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#57
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.