↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Rhythmicity by Autocatalysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian Rhythmicity by Autocatalysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun Mehra, Christian I Hong, Mi Shi, Jennifer J Loros, Jay C Dunlap, Peter Ruoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 49 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Professor 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 46%
Physics and Astronomy 7 12%
Chemistry 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2007.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,479
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,961
of 90,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.