↓ Skip to main content

Noise-Induced Min Phenotypes in E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noise-Induced Min Phenotypes in E. coli
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020080
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Fange, Johan Elf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 119 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 29%
Researcher 37 27%
Student > Master 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 35%
Physics and Astronomy 22 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Mathematics 10 7%
Computer Science 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2006.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,480
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,007
of 87,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.