↓ Skip to main content

Large-Scale Trends in the Evolution of Gene Structures within 11 Animal Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-Scale Trends in the Evolution of Gene Structures within 11 Animal Genomes
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Yandell, Chris J Mungall, Chris Smith, Simon Prochnik, Joshua Kaminker, George Hartzell, Suzanna Lewis, Gerald M Rubin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 7%
United Kingdom 9 6%
Germany 4 3%
Switzerland 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 113 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Professor 10 7%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 64%
Computer Science 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Mathematics 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 10 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2007.
All research outputs
#7,363,939
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,996
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,585
of 91,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.