↓ Skip to main content

Impact of organised cervical screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in migrant women in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of organised cervical screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in migrant women in Australia
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nayyereh Aminisani, Bruce K Armstrong, Sam Egger, Karen Canfell

Abstract

Organised cervical screening, introduced in 1991, appears to have reduced rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in women in Australia. This study aimed to assess whether cervical cancer rates in migrant women in the state of New South Wales (NSW) showed a similar pattern of change to that in Australian-born women after 1991.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 26 27%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,023,610
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,786
of 8,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,812
of 183,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#44
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.