↓ Skip to main content

Effects of group metacognitive training (MCT) on mental capacity and functioning in patients with psychosis in a secure forensic psychiatric hospital: a prospective-cohort waiting list controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of group metacognitive training (MCT) on mental capacity and functioning in patients with psychosis in a secure forensic psychiatric hospital: a prospective-cohort waiting list controlled study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Naughton, Andrea Nulty, Mary Davoren, Zareena Abidin, Sarah O'Dwyer, Harry G Kennedy

Abstract

Metacognitive Training (MCT) is a manualised cognitive intervention for psychosis aimed at transferring knowledge of cognitive biases and providing corrective experiences. The aim of MCT is to facilitate symptom reduction and protect against relapse. In a naturalistic audit of clinical effectiveness we examined what effect group MCT has on mental capacity, symptoms of psychosis and global function in patients with a psychotic illness, when compared with a waiting list comparison group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 15 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,240,249
of 15,070,999 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,177
of 3,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,469
of 152,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#66
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,070,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.