The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and enablers to caregivers' responsive feeding behaviour: A systematic review to inform childhood obesity prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/obr.13228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah A. Redsell, Vicki Slater, Jennie Rose, Ellinor K. Olander, Karen Matvienko‐Sikar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,845,016
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Reviews
#857
of 1,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,557
of 431,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Reviews
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.