You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Progression of the “Psychological Typhoon Eye” and Variations Since the Wenchuan Earthquake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu Li, Li-Lin Rao, Xin-Wen Bai, Rui Zheng, Xiao-Peng Ren, Jin-Zhen Li, Zuo-Jun Wang, Huan Liu, Kan Zhang |
| Abstract |
In 2008 after a massive earthquake jolted Wenchuan, China, we reported an effect that we termed a "Psychological Typhoon Eye": the closer to the center of the devastated area, the lower the level of concern felt by residents about safety and health. We now report on the progression of this effect and the development of new variations after the quake as well as investigating potential explanations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,852,559
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,896
of 193,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,608
of 106,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#109
of 652 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 652 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.