↓ Skip to main content

An Experimental and Computational Study of the Effect of ActA Polarity on the Speed of Listeria monocytogenes Actin-based Motility

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Experimental and Computational Study of the Effect of ActA Polarity on the Speed of Listeria monocytogenes Actin-based Motility
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne M. Rafelski, Jonathan B. Alberts, Garrett M. Odell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 2 5%
India 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 29 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,636
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,057
of 122,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.