↓ Skip to main content

Major Radiations in the Evolution of Caviid Rodents: Reconciling Fossils, Ghost Lineages, and Relaxed Molecular Clocks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Major Radiations in the Evolution of Caviid Rodents: Reconciling Fossils, Ghost Lineages, and Relaxed Molecular Clocks
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048380
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Encarnación Pérez, Diego Pol

Abstract

Caviidae is a diverse group of caviomorph rodents that is broadly distributed in South America and is divided into three highly divergent extant lineages: Caviinae (cavies), Dolichotinae (maras), and Hydrochoerinae (capybaras). The fossil record of Caviidae is only abundant and diverse since the late Miocene. Caviids belongs to Cavioidea sensu stricto (Cavioidea s.s.) that also includes a diverse assemblage of extinct taxa recorded from the late Oligocene to the middle Miocene of South America ("eocardiids").

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Panama 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 49%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 20%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,737,307
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,767
of 223,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,490
of 202,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#820
of 4,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.