↓ Skip to main content

Risks posed by SARS‐CoV‐2 to North American bats during winter fieldwork

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 1,056)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks posed by SARS‐CoV‐2 to North American bats during winter fieldwork
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/csp2.410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Cook, Evan H. C. Grant, Jeremy T. H. Coleman, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Michael C. Runge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 39%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#237,654
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#29
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,221
of 453,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#4
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.