↓ Skip to main content

Risks posed by SARS‐CoV‐2 to North American bats during winter fieldwork

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 680)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks posed by SARS‐CoV‐2 to North American bats during winter fieldwork
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/csp2.410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Cook, Evan H. C. Grant, Jeremy T. H. Coleman, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Michael C. Runge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 40%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#169,718
of 21,192,559 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#14
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,331
of 329,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,192,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.