↓ Skip to main content

W44X mutation in the WWOX gene causes intractable seizures and developmental delay: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
W44X mutation in the WWOX gene causes intractable seizures and developmental delay: a case report
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12881-016-0317-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loai Elsaadany, Mahmoud El-Said, Rehab Ali, Hussein Kamel, Tawfeg Ben-Omran

Abstract

WW domain containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) gene was cloned in 2000; alteration has been seen in many cancer cells. It acts as a tumor suppresser by blocking cell growth and causing apoptosis. WWOX protein showed different expression of mice brain and spinal cord, for which deletion causes seizure and early death. Clinical and molecular characteristics of a consanguineous family show a homozygous mutation of WWOX gene at specific bases, causing a debilitating syndrome characterized by growth retardation, intractable epilepsy, intellectual disability, and early death. Using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), a novel homozygous mutation in the WWOX gene is identified in a consanguineous Arab family from Qatar with two daughters who presented with intractable seizure and developmental delay. The study presents the importance of human WWOX gene for brain development and the association between gene mutation and epileptic encephalopathy. It also highlights the power of WES particularly in clinically challenging cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Neuroscience 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,194
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,849
of 381,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.