You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc14725 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luciano Gattinoni, Eleonora Carlesso, Alessandro Santini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 20% |
Mexico | 3 | 5% |
Chile | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Norway | 2 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Nepal | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 22% |
Scientists | 10 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 16% |
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 64% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,294,498
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,084
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,380
of 395,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#67
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.