↓ Skip to main content

The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape
Published in
PLoS Biology, April 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Fraser, Liam Brierley, Gautam Dey, Jessica K. Polka, Máté Pálfy, Federico Nanni, Jonathon Alexis Coates

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 34 15%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 34 15%
Social Sciences 29 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 77 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 470. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#58,588
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#136
of 9,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,018
of 457,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#6
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.