↓ Skip to main content

Calcareous microfossil-based orbital cyclostratigraphy in the Arctic Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcareous microfossil-based orbital cyclostratigraphy in the Arctic Ocean
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.07.004
Authors

Rachel E. Marzen, Lauren H. DeNinno, Thomas M. Cronin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 59%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#10,699,146
of 17,816,628 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#2,122
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,843
of 273,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#32
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,816,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.