↓ Skip to main content

Synbiotic therapy decreases microbial translocation and inflammation and improves immunological status in HIV-infected patients: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synbiotic therapy decreases microbial translocation and inflammation and improves immunological status in HIV-infected patients: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-11-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz A González-Hernández, Luis F Jave-Suarez, Mary Fafutis-Morris, Karina E Montes-Salcedo, Luis G Valle-Gutierrez, Ariel E Campos-Loza, Luis Fermin Enciso-Gómez, Jaime F Andrade-Villanueva

Abstract

HIV-infection results in damage and dysfunction of the gastrointestinal system. HIV enteropathy includes pronounced CD4+ T-cell loss, increased intestinal permeability, and microbial translocation that promotes systemic immune activation, which is implicated in disease progression. A synbiotic is the combination of probiotics and prebiotics that could improve gut barrier function. Our study goal was to determine whether the use of a synbiotic, probiotics or a prebiotic can recover immunological parameters in HIV-infected subjects through of a reduction of microbial translocation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2012.
All research outputs
#4,530,514
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#749
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,438
of 183,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.