You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic Medical Conditions and Risk of Sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry E. Wang, Nathan I. Shapiro, Russell Griffin, Monika M. Safford, Suzanne Judd, George Howard |
| Abstract |
We sought to determine the associations between baseline chronic medical conditions and future risk of sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 60 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,587,249
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,726
of 193,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,069
of 184,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#645
of 4,894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.