↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Comparison of Escherichia coli O104:H4 Isolates from 2009 and 2011 Reveals Plasmid, and Prophage Heterogeneity, Including Shiga Toxin Encoding Phage stx2

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic Comparison of Escherichia coli O104:H4 Isolates from 2009 and 2011 Reveals Plasmid, and Prophage Heterogeneity, Including Shiga Toxin Encoding Phage stx2
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanaa A. Ahmed, Joy Awosika, Carson Baldwin, Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly, Biswajit Biswas, Stacey Broomall, Patrick S. G. Chain, Olga Chertkov, Otar Chokoshvili, Susan Coyne, Karen Davenport, J. Chris Detter, William Dorman, Tracy H. Erkkila, Jason P. Folster, Kenneth G. Frey, Matroner George, Cheryl Gleasner, Matthew Henry, Karen K. Hill, Kyle Hubbard, Joseph Insalaco, Shannon Johnson, Aaron Kitzmiller, Michael Krepps, Chien-Chi Lo, Truong Luu, Lauren A. McNew, Timothy Minogue, Christine A. Munk, Brian Osborne, Mohit Patel, Krista G. Reitenga, C. Nicole Rosenzweig, April Shea, Xiaohong Shen, Nancy Strockbine, Cheryl Tarr, Hazuki Teshima, Eric van Gieson, Kathleen Verratti, Mark Wolcott, Gary Xie, Shanmuga Sozhamannan, Henry S. Gibbons

Abstract

In May of 2011, an enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O104:H4 strain that had acquired a Shiga toxin 2-converting phage caused a large outbreak of bloody diarrhea in Europe which was notable for its high prevalence of hemolytic uremic syndrome cases. Several studies have described the genomic inventory and phylogenies of strains associated with the outbreak and a collection of historical E. coli O104:H4 isolates using draft genome assemblies. We present the complete, closed genome sequences of an isolate from the 2011 outbreak (2011C-3493) and two isolates from cases of bloody diarrhea that occurred in the Republic of Georgia in 2009 (2009EL-2050 and 2009EL-2071). Comparative genome analysis indicates that, while the Georgian strains are the nearest neighbors to the 2011 outbreak isolates sequenced to date, structural and nucleotide-level differences are evident in the Stx2 phage genomes, the mer/tet antibiotic resistance island, and in the prophage and plasmid profiles of the strains, including a previously undescribed plasmid with homology to the pMT virulence plasmid of Yersinia pestis. In addition, multiphenotype analysis showed that 2009EL-2071 possessed higher resistance to polymyxin and membrane-disrupting agents. Finally, we show evidence by electron microscopy of the presence of a common phage morphotype among the European and Georgian strains and a second phage morphotype among the Georgian strains. The presence of at least two stx2 phage genotypes in host genetic backgrounds that may derive from a recent common ancestor of the 2011 outbreak isolates indicates that the emergence of stx2 phage-containing E. coli O104:H4 strains probably occurred more than once, or that the current outbreak isolates may be the result of a recent transfer of a new stx2 phage element into a pre-existing stx2-positive genetic background.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Spain 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 28%
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,982,798
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#49,358
of 216,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,024
of 191,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#847
of 4,907 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,907 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.