You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microstructural Abnormalities in Subcortical Reward Circuitry of Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013945 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne J. Blood, Dan V. Iosifescu, Nikos Makris, Roy H. Perlis, David N. Kennedy, Darin D. Dougherty, Byoung Woo Kim, Myung Joo Lee, Shirley Wu, Sang Lee, Jesse Calhoun, Steven M. Hodge, Maurizio Fava, Bruce R. Rosen, Jordan W. Smoller, Gregory P. Gasic, Hans C. Breiter, for the Phenotype Genotype Project on Addiction and Mood Disorders |
| Abstract |
Previous studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) have focused on abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex and medial temporal regions. There has been little investigation in MDD of midbrain and subcortical regions central to reward/aversion function, such as the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra (VTA/SN), and medial forebrain bundle (MFB). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 20% |
| Psychology | 31 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,460,341
of 24,225,722 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,531
of 208,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,056
of 187,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#802
of 1,007 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,225,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,007 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.