↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of Associative Learning in Chemical Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
pinterest
1 Pinner

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of Associative Learning in Chemical Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon McGregor, Vera Vasas, Phil Husbands, Chrisantha Fernando

Abstract

Organisms that can learn about their environment and modify their behaviour appropriately during their lifetime are more likely to survive and reproduce than organisms that do not. While associative learning - the ability to detect correlated features of the environment - has been studied extensively in nervous systems, where the underlying mechanisms are reasonably well understood, mechanisms within single cells that could allow associative learning have received little attention. Here, using in silico evolution of chemical networks, we show that there exists a diversity of remarkably simple and plausible chemical solutions to the associative learning problem, the simplest of which uses only one core chemical reaction. We then asked to what extent a linear combination of chemical concentrations in the network could approximate the ideal Bayesian posterior of an environment given the stimulus history so far? This Bayesian analysis revealed the 'memory traces' of the chemical network. The implication of this paper is that there is little reason to believe that a lack of suitable phenotypic variation would prevent associative learning from evolving in cell signalling, metabolic, gene regulatory, or a mixture of these networks in cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 35%
Computer Science 11 14%
Physics and Astronomy 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,776
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,099
of 202,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#41
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.