↓ Skip to main content

Recognition of Emotions in Autism: A Formal Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
612 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
859 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recognition of Emotions in Autism: A Formal Meta-Analysis
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1695-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirko Uljarevic, Antonia Hamilton

Abstract

Determining the integrity of emotion recognition in autistic spectrum disorder is important to our theoretical understanding of autism and to teaching social skills. Previous studies have reported both positive and negative results. Here, we take a formal meta-analytic approach, bringing together data from 48 papers testing over 980 participants with autism. Results show there is an emotion recognition difficulty in autism, with a mean effect size of 0.80 which reduces to 0.41 when a correction for publication bias is applied. Recognition of happiness was only marginally impaired in autism, but recognition of fear was marginally worse than recognition of happiness. This meta-analysis provides an opportunity to survey the state of emotion recognition research in autism and to outline potential future directions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 859 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 836 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 156 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 17%
Student > Bachelor 114 13%
Researcher 70 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 8%
Other 130 15%
Unknown 170 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 371 43%
Neuroscience 55 6%
Social Sciences 46 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 4%
Computer Science 35 4%
Other 105 12%
Unknown 209 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,732,416
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#688
of 5,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,290
of 203,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#8
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.