↓ Skip to main content

Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 300)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, April 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minji Kim, Yonghoon Lee, Divy Mehra, Alfonso L Sabater, Anat Galor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,467,397
of 22,458,746 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#9
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,158
of 335,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,458,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.