You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prostatic Acid Phosphatase Is Required for the Antinociceptive Effects of Thiamine and Benfotiamine
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048562 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie K. Hurt, Jennifer L. Coleman, Brendan J. Fitzpatrick, Bonnie Taylor-Blake, Arlene S. Bridges, Pirkko Vihko, Mark J. Zylka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 30% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,695,810
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#138,787
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,489
of 207,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,499
of 4,948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.