You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Early Youth Engagement in first episode psychosis (EYE-2) study: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a team-based motivational engagement intervention to improve engagement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-021-05105-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Greenwood, Rebecca Webb, Jenny Gu, David Fowler, Richard de Visser, Stephen Bremner, Iga Abramowicz, Nicky Perry, Stuart Clark, Anastacia O’Donnell, Dan Charlton, Rebecca Jarvis, Philippa Garety, Sunil Nandha, Belinda Lennox, Louise Johns, Shanaya Rathod, Peter Phiri, Paul French, Heather Law, Jo Hodgekins, Michelle Painter, Cate Treise, James Plaistow, Francis Irwin, Rose Thompson, Tanya Mackay, Carl R. May, Andy Healey, Richard Hooper, Emmanuelle Peters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 43% |
| Scientists | 10 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,044,468
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#421
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,442
of 459,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them