You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Noninvasive sampling of the distal airspace via HME-filter fluid is not useful to detect SARS-CoV-2 in intubated patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03549-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joerg Reifart, Christoph Liebetrau, Christian Troidl, Katharina Madlener, Andreas Rolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,382
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,631
of 453,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#94
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.