| Title |
Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep30383 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana R. C. Donati, Solaiman Shokur, Edgard Morya, Debora S. F. Campos, Renan C. Moioli, Claudia M. Gitti, Patricia B. Augusto, Sandra Tripodi, Cristhiane G. Pires, Gislaine A. Pereira, Fabricio L. Brasil, Simone Gallo, Anthony A. Lin, Angelo K. Takigami, Maria A. Aratanha, Sanjay Joshi, Hannes Bleuler, Gordon Cheng, Alan Rudolph, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 16% |
| Brazil | 23 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 6% |
| Japan | 17 | 5% |
| France | 11 | 3% |
| Italy | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 147 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 288 | 84% |
| Scientists | 32 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 777 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 765 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 129 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 124 | 16% |
| Researcher | 99 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 114 | 15% |
| Unknown | 187 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 159 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 92 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 6% |
| Psychology | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 145 | 19% |
| Unknown | 215 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1856. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,390
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#86
of 143,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45
of 370,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 3,717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.