Title |
Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/srep30383 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana R. C. Donati, Solaiman Shokur, Edgard Morya, Debora S. F. Campos, Renan C. Moioli, Claudia M. Gitti, Patricia B. Augusto, Sandra Tripodi, Cristhiane G. Pires, Gislaine A. Pereira, Fabricio L. Brasil, Simone Gallo, Anthony A. Lin, Angelo K. Takigami, Maria A. Aratanha, Sanjay Joshi, Hannes Bleuler, Gordon Cheng, Alan Rudolph, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis |
Abstract |
Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) provide a new assistive strategy aimed at restoring mobility in severely paralyzed patients. Yet, no study in animals or in human subjects has indicated that long-term BMI training could induce any type of clinical recovery. Eight chronic (3-13 years) spinal cord injury (SCI) paraplegics were subjected to long-term training (12 months) with a multi-stage BMI-based gait neurorehabilitation paradigm aimed at restoring locomotion. This paradigm combined intense immersive virtual reality training, enriched visual-tactile feedback, and walking with two EEG-controlled robotic actuators, including a custom-designed lower limb exoskeleton capable of delivering tactile feedback to subjects. Following 12 months of training with this paradigm, all eight patients experienced neurological improvements in somatic sensation (pain localization, fine/crude touch, and proprioceptive sensing) in multiple dermatomes. Patients also regained voluntary motor control in key muscles below the SCI level, as measured by EMGs, resulting in marked improvement in their walking index. As a result, 50% of these patients were upgraded to an incomplete paraplegia classification. Neurological recovery was paralleled by the reemergence of lower limb motor imagery at cortical level. We hypothesize that this unprecedented neurological recovery results from both cortical and spinal cord plasticity triggered by long-term BMI usage. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 61 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 25 | 7% |
Japan | 18 | 5% |
Brazil | 18 | 5% |
France | 14 | 4% |
Canada | 12 | 3% |
Australia | 11 | 3% |
Italy | 9 | 2% |
Germany | 6 | 2% |
Other | 38 | 10% |
Unknown | 151 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 307 | 85% |
Scientists | 33 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Singapore | 2 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 533 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 21% |
Student > Master | 100 | 18% |
Researcher | 71 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 66 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
Other | 92 | 17% |
Unknown | 78 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 122 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 69 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 9% |
Psychology | 29 | 5% |
Other | 102 | 19% |
Unknown | 108 | 20% |