↓ Skip to main content

Honey sample collection methods influence pollen composition in determining true nectar-foraging bee plants

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Botanica Brasilica, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Honey sample collection methods influence pollen composition in determining true nectar-foraging bee plants
Published in
Acta Botanica Brasilica, September 2020
DOI 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0086
Authors

Ujjwal Layek, Rajib Mondal, Prakash Karmakar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,062,102
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#175
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,251
of 399,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.