↓ Skip to main content

Cholera risk factors, Papua New Guinea, 2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cholera risk factors, Papua New Guinea, 2010
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Rosewell, Benita Addy, Lucas Komnapi, Freda Makanda, Berry Ropa, Enoch Posanai, Samir Dutta, Glen Mola, WY Nicola Man, Anthony Zwi, C Raina MacIntyre

Abstract

Cholera is newly emergent in Papua New Guinea but may soon become endemic. Identifying the risk factors for cholera provides evidence for targeted prevention and control measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 24%
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Engineering 9 6%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,046
of 7,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,556
of 183,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#54
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.