↓ Skip to main content

Consistent condom use increases spontaneous regression in high-risk non-HPV16 but not in HPV16 CIN2-3 lesions, a prospective population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consistent condom use increases spontaneous regression in high-risk non-HPV16 but not in HPV16 CIN2-3 lesions, a prospective population-based cohort study
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-7-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ane Munk, Irene Øvestad, Einar Gudlaugsson, Kjell Løvslett, Bent Fiane, Bianca van Diermen-Hidle, Arnold-Jan Kruse, Ivar Skaland, Emiel AM Janssen, Jan PA Baak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,498,945
of 5,040,289 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#61
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,105
of 84,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,040,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.