↓ Skip to main content

Emergence of Good Conduct, Scaling and Zipf Laws in Human Behavioral Sequences in an Online World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergence of Good Conduct, Scaling and Zipf Laws in Human Behavioral Sequences in an Online World
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Thurner, Michael Szell, Roberta Sinatra

Abstract

We study behavioral action sequences of players in a massive multiplayer online game. In their virtual life players use eight basic actions which allow them to interact with each other. These actions are communication, trade, establishing or breaking friendships and enmities, attack, and punishment. We measure the probabilities for these actions conditional on previous taken and received actions and find a dramatic increase of negative behavior immediately after receiving negative actions. Similarly, positive behavior is intensified by receiving positive actions. We observe a tendency towards antipersistence in communication sequences. Classifying actions as positive (good) and negative (bad) allows us to define binary 'world lines' of lives of individuals. Positive and negative actions are persistent and occur in clusters, indicated by large scaling exponents α ~ 0.87 of the mean square displacement of the world lines. For all eight action types we find strong signs for high levels of repetitiveness, especially for negative actions. We partition behavioral sequences into segments of length n (behavioral 'words' and 'motifs') and study their statistical properties. We find two approximate power laws in the word ranking distribution, one with an exponent of κ ~ -1 for the ranks up to 100, and another with a lower exponent for higher ranks. The Shannon n-tuple redundancy yields large values and increases in terms of word length, further underscoring the non-trivial statistical properties of behavioral sequences. On the collective, societal level the timeseries of particular actions per day can be understood by a simple mean-reverting log-normal model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 9%
Germany 3 4%
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 57 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 33%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 19%
Physics and Astronomy 13 17%
Psychology 12 15%
Computer Science 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,042,871
of 24,978,429 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,537
of 216,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,479
of 254,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#137
of 3,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,978,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.