@AmreiBahr @JCzierpka Solchen Agenten-basierten Modellen bieten interessante Einsichten: "We find that a small fraction of incorrect (selfish or rational) referees is sufficient to drastically lower the quality of the published (accepted) scientific stand
558 followers
237 followers
And returning to the problem of Reviewer 2. S. Thurner, R. Hanel. 2011. Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: toward selection of the average. The European Physical Journal B. 84:707–711. https://t.co/CrveRzQTip. https://t.co/ZXRrVSoVZf
666 followers
RT @KirkegaardEmil: For most of scientific history, there was no peer review in current fashion, or most, just a quick editor judgment. May…
558 followers
@DrLutzBoehm Yep, I think what the academic grant distribution system is causing is best described as this: "Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average" https://t.co/5Roi6x9jBH