You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Cations Can Assist DNase I in DNA Binding and Hydrolysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Guéroult, Daniel Picot, Joséphine Abi-Ghanem, Brigitte Hartmann, Marc Baaden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,968,106
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,297
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,381
of 188,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.