You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploiting Temporal Network Structures of Human Interaction to Effectively Immunize Populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036439 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sungmin Lee, Luis E. C. Rocha, Fredrik Liljeros, Petter Holme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 36 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 17% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,175,336
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,720
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,746
of 164,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,796
of 3,755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.