↓ Skip to main content

Tracking Traders' Understanding of the Market Using e-Communication Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking Traders' Understanding of the Market Using e-Communication Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serguei Saavedra, Jordi Duch, Brian Uzzi

Abstract

Tracking the volume of keywords in Internet searches, message boards, or Tweets has provided an alternative for following or predicting associations between popular interest or disease incidences. Here, we extend that research by examining the role of e-communications among day traders and their collective understanding of the market. Our study introduces a general method that focuses on bundles of words that behave differently from daily communication routines, and uses original data covering the content of instant messages among all day traders at a trading firm over a 40-month period. Analyses show that two word bundles convey traders' understanding of same day market events and potential next day market events. We find that when market volatility is high, traders' communications are dominated by same day events, and when volatility is low, communications are dominated by next day events. We show that the stronger the traders' attention to either same day or next day events, the higher their collective trading performance. We conclude that e-communication among traders is a product of mass collaboration over diverse viewpoints that embodies unique information about their weak or strong understanding of the market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 4%
Spain 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
China 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 68 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 10 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 13%
Computer Science 7 9%
Physics and Astronomy 7 9%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Other 23 29%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,085,373
of 24,452,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,168
of 211,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,626
of 144,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#149
of 2,619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.