The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010176.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Momen A Atieh, Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha, Alan Gt Payne, Sara Ali, Clovis M Jr Faggion, Marco Esposito |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 295 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 138 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 154 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,900,297
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,881
of 13,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,503
of 458,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.