↓ Skip to main content

Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
17 tweeters
1 Facebook page


4 Dimensions

Readers on

15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma
Published in
CHEST, September 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013
Pubmed ID

Liam G. Heaney, Luis Perez de Llano, Mona Al-Ahmad, Vibeke Backer, John Busby, Giorgio Walter Canonica, George C. Christoff, Borja G. Cosio, J. Mark FitzGerald, Enrico Heffler, Takashi Iwanaga, David J. Jackson, Andrew N. Menzies-Gow, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Andriana I. Papaioannou, Paul E. Pfeffer, Todor A. Popov, Celeste M. Porsbjerg, Chin Kook Rhee, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Yuji Tohda, Eileen Wang, Michael E. Wechsler, Marianna Alacqua, Alan Altraja, Leif Bjermer, Unnur S. Björnsdóttir, Arnaud Bourdin, Guy G. Brusselle, Roland Buhl, Richard W. Costello, Mark Hew, Mariko Siyue Koh, Sverre Lehmann, Lauri Lehtimäki, Matthew Peters, Camille Taillé, Christian Taube, Trung N. Tran, James Zangrilli, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Victoria A. Carter, Isha Chaudhry, Neva Eleangovan, Naeimeh Hosseini, Marjan Kerkhof, Ruth B. Murray, Chris A. Price, David B. Price

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
of 19,280,406 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
of 11,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 332,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,280,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.