You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma An Expert Consensus Framework to Characterize Phenotypes in a Global Real-Life Severe Asthma Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam G Heaney, Luis Perez de Llano, Mona Al-Ahmad, Vibeke Backer, John Busby, Giorgio Walter Canonica, George C Christoff, Borja G Cosio, J Mark FitzGerald, Enrico Heffler, Takashi Iwanaga, David J Jackson, Andrew N Menzies-Gow, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos, Andriana I Papaioannou, Paul E Pfeffer, Todor A Popov, Celeste M Porsbjerg, Chin Kook Rhee, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Yuji Tohda, Eileen Wang, Michael E Wechsler, Marianna Alacqua, Alan Altraja, Leif Bjermer, Unnur S Björnsdóttir, Arnaud Bourdin, Guy G Brusselle, Roland Buhl, Richard W Costello, Mark Hew, Mariko Siyue Koh, Sverre Lehmann, Lauri Lehtimäki, Matthew Peters, Camille Taillé, Christian Taube, Trung N Tran, James Zangrilli, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Victoria A Carter, Isha Chaudhry, Neva Eleangovan, Naeimeh Hosseini, Marjan Kerkhof, Ruth B Murray, Chris A Price, David B Price |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,216,724
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#958
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,951
of 452,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#22
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.