You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Revealing the Hyperdiverse Mite Fauna of Subarctic Canada through DNA Barcoding
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0048755 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monica R. Young, Valerie M. Behan-Pelletier, Paul D. N. Hebert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 30% |
Researcher | 25 | 23% |
Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 65% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,720,646
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,158
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,528
of 186,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#654
of 4,913 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,913 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.