↓ Skip to main content

Radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PELICAN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PELICAN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05248-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walma, M. S., Rombouts, S. J., Brada, L. J. H., Borel Rinkes, I. H., Bosscha, K., Bruijnen, R. C., Busch, O. R., Creemers, G. J., Daams, F., van Dam, R. M., van Delden, O. M., Festen, S., Ghorbani, P., de Groot, D. J., de Groot, J. W. B., Haj Mohammad, N., van Hillegersberg, R., de Hingh, I. H., D’Hondt, M., Kerver, E. D., van Leeuwen, M. S., Liem, M. S., van Lienden, K. P., Los, M., de Meijer, V. E., Meijerink, M. R., Mekenkamp, L. J., Nio, C. Y., Oulad Abdennabi, I., Pando, E., Patijn, G. A., Polée, M. B., Pruijt, J. F., Roeyen, G., Ropela, J. A., Stommel, M. W. J., de Vos-Geelen, J., de Vries, J. J., van der Waal, E. M., Wessels, F. J., Wilmink, J. W., van Santvoort, H. C., Besselink, M. G., Molenaar, I. Q.

Abstract

Approximately 80% of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with chemotherapy, of whom approximately 10% undergo a resection. Cohort studies investigating local tumor ablation with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have reported a promising overall survival of 26-34 months when given in a multimodal setting. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of RFA in combination with chemotherapy in patients with LAPC are lacking. The "Pancreatic Locally Advanced Unresectable Cancer Ablation" (PELICAN) trial is an international multicenter superiority RCT, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG). All patients with LAPC according to DPCG criteria, who start with FOLFIRINOX or (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine, are screened for eligibility. Restaging is performed after completion of four cycles of FOLFIRINOX or two cycles of (nab-paclitaxel/)gemcitabine (i.e., 2 months of treatment), and the results are assessed within a nationwide online expert panel. Eligible patients with RECIST stable disease or objective response, in whom resection is not feasible, are randomized to RFA followed by chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In total, 228 patients will be included in 16 centers in The Netherlands and four other European centers. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, RECIST response, CA 19.9 and CEA response, toxicity, quality of life, pain, costs, and immunomodulatory effects of RFA. The PELICAN RCT aims to assess whether the combination of chemotherapy and RFA improves the overall survival when compared to chemotherapy alone, in patients with LAPC with no progression of disease following 2 months of systemic treatment. Dutch Trial Registry NL4997 . Registered on December 29, 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03690323 . Retrospectively registered on October 1, 2018.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,769,567
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#698
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,533
of 457,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them