↓ Skip to main content

What We Eat Is Who We Are: The Role of Ethnic Attachment as an Ideological Base of Animal Exploitation

Overview of attention for article published in Anthrozoos, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What We Eat Is Who We Are: The Role of Ethnic Attachment as an Ideological Base of Animal Exploitation
Published in
Anthrozoos, March 2021
DOI 10.1080/08927936.2021.1898216
Authors

Marija Branković

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 15%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,511,565
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Anthrozoos
#510
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,050
of 452,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anthrozoos
#22
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.