You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Bert Gordijn, Jonathan Lewis, Mohammad Hosseini, János Kristóf Bodnár, Soren Holm, Péter Kakuk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,338,917
of 24,904,819 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#100
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,763
of 432,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,904,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.